State v. Cruz

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Cruz

877 S.W.2d 215, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 891, 1994 WL 241004

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 7, 1994·No. Nos. 62693, 64543·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Miquel Cruz, appeals from his conviction in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis on one count of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202 RSMo Supp. 1993, and from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, we have furnished the parties with a memorandum opinion setting forth the facts and reasons for this opinion.

The judgments of the trial court and motion court are affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Miquel Cruz, appeals from his conviction in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis on one count of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202 RSMo Supp. 1993, and from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, we have furnished the parties with a memorandum opinion setting forth the facts and reasons for this opinion.

The judgments of the trial court and motion court are affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Cruz, 877 S.W.2d 215, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 891, 1994 WL 241004 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

877 S.W.2d 215 (State v. Cruz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.