State v. Cruz

753 A.2d 938, 253 Conn. 901, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 146
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedApril 28, 2000
DocketSC 16299
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 753 A.2d 938 (State v. Cruz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Cruz, 753 A.2d 938, 253 Conn. 901, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 146 (Colo. 2000).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 763 (AC 18323), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly allow the testimony of a social worker identifying the defendant as the perpetrator under the medical treatment exception to the hearsay rule?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cruz
792 A.2d 823 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
753 A.2d 938, 253 Conn. 901, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cruz-conn-2000.