State v. Cruz-Aguirre
This text of State v. Cruz-Aguirre (State v. Cruz-Aguirre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed: October 25, 2001
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON
STATE OF OREGON,
Respondent on Review,
v.
FROYLAN CRUZ-AGUIRRE,
Petitioner on Review.
(CC 95CR3094FE; CA A97471; SC S46254)
On petition for review filed March 17, 1999.*
Andy Simrin, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the petition for petitioner on review.
No appearance contra.
Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Durham, Leeson, Riggs and De Muniz, Justices.**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of State v. Fugate, 332 Or 195, 26 P3d 802, (2001).
*Appeal from Douglas County Circuit Court, Joan G. Seitz, Judge. 158 Or App 15, 972 P2d 1206 (1999).
**Van Hoomissen, J., retired December 31, 2000, and did not participate in the decision of this case; Kulongoski, J., resigned June 14, 2001, and did not participate in the decision of this case. Balmer, J. did not participate in the decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Cruz-Aguirre, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cruz-aguirre-or-2001.