State v. Crusoe

261 S.W.3d 620, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 807, 2008 WL 2421008
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 17, 2008·No. ED 90012·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eli Crusoe (Appellant) appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree assault, in violation of section 565.060 RSMo 2000, 1 and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015. Appellant was sentenced as a prior offender to three years for second-degree assault and twenty years for armed criminal action, to run concurrently. We affirm.

*621 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Crusoe, 261 S.W.3d 620, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 807, 2008 WL 2421008 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

261 S.W.3d 620 (State v. Crusoe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crusoe v. State
328 S.W.3d 321 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)