State v. . Crump

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Crump

10 S.E. 468, 104 N.C. 763

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedSeptember 5, 1889

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 10 S.E. 468 (State v. . Crump) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Crump, 10 S.E. 468, 104 N.C. 763 (N.C. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Shepherd, J.:

The defendant was charged with peddling without a license as required by law. There was a special verdict, and this does not find whether or not the defendant had such license. Nor does it find that he was required to exhibit one bjr the proper authorities and failed to do so; in *764 which case there would have been a presumption that he had none. Section 24, chap. 216, Acts 1889.

The verdict being thus fatally defective, there must be a new trial. State v. Oakley, 103 N. C., 409; State v. Bray, 89 N. C., 480.

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shepherd, J.:

The defendant was charged with peddling without a license as required by law. There was a special verdict, and this does not find whether or not the defendant had such license. Nor does it find that he was required to exhibit one bjr the proper authorities and failed to do so; in *764 which case there would have been a presumption that he had none. Section 24, chap. 216, Acts 1889.

The verdict being thus fatally defective, there must be a new trial. State v. Oakley, 103 N. C., 409; State v. Bray, 89 N. C., 480.

Error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 S.E. 468, 104 N.C. 763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-crump-nc-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack