State v. Crump

932 S.W.2d 876, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1796, 1996 WL 623040
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Crump. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 22
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 29, 1996·No. Nos. 68239, 70296·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for one count of second-degree burglary, § 569.170, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender, § 558.016, to fifteen years’ imprisonment, to run concurrently with the sentence in an unrelated case. Defendant alleges the trial court erred when it did not grant a mistrial [877]*877sua sponte during closing argument after a personal attack by the prosecutor on Defendant’s attorney. Defendant also alleges error in the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without a hearing. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum outlining the reasons for this order affirming the judgments of the trial and motion courts. Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Crump, 932 S.W.2d 876, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1796, 1996 WL 623040 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

932 S.W.2d 876 (State v. Crump) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.