State v. Crumm

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Crumm

222 So. 2d 880, 254 La. 123, 1969 La. LEXIS 2826

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 5, 1969

DocketNo. 49880

StatusPublished

This text of 222 So. 2d 880 (State v. Crumm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Crumm, 222 So. 2d 880, 254 La. 123, 1969 La. LEXIS 2826 (La. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writ of certiorari.

The petition of the relator in the above •entitled and numbered case having been •duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Rudolph F. Becker, Jr., Judge of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 13th day of October, 1969, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein,- to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondents through their attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writ of certiorari.

The petition of the relator in the above •entitled and numbered case having been •duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Rudolph F. Becker, Jr., Judge of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 13th day of October, 1969, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein,- to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondents through their attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 So. 2d 880, 254 La. 123, 1969 La. LEXIS 2826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-crumm-la-1969.