State v. Crowley

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Crowley

94 A. 754, 113 Me. 568, 1915 Me. LEXIS 170

CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine

DecidedJuly 12, 1915

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 94 A. 754 (State v. Crowley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Crowley, 94 A. 754, 113 Me. 568, 1915 Me. LEXIS 170 (Me. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

The respondent was tried and found guilty by the Judge of the Bangor Municipal Court [569]*569upon the charge of intoxication and was sentenced to pay a fine of three dollars and costs of prosecution. From this sentence, the respondent appealed to the Supreme Judicial Court and was tried at the September term of said court, 1914, and the jury returned a verdict of guilty. The respondent excepted to the admission of certain evidence. Exceptions overruled.

Donald F. Snow, County Attorney for the State. A. L. Blanchard, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The respondent was tried and found guilty by the Judge of the Bangor Municipal Court [569]*569upon the charge of intoxication and was sentenced to pay a fine of three dollars and costs of prosecution. From this sentence, the respondent appealed to the Supreme Judicial Court and was tried at the September term of said court, 1914, and the jury returned a verdict of guilty. The respondent excepted to the admission of certain evidence. Exceptions overruled.

Donald F. Snow, County Attorney for the State. A. L. Blanchard, for appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 A. 754, 113 Me. 568, 1915 Me. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-crowley-me-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack