State v. Crowder
39 Tex. 47
Opinion
The sufficiency of the indictment in this •case depends upon whether the word gambling may be [48] substituted for the word gaming, as adjectives qualifying-the noun “house.” We think the words are equivalent in this sense, under Article 2034, Paschal’s Digest, which declares that any thing or act that would be deemed a nuisance at common law shall be indictable as a misdemeanor under the statute. This indictment is good, and the court erred in quashing it.
The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Crowder, 39 Tex. 47 (Tex. 1873).
39 Tex. 47 (State v. Crowder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Frederick
109 N.E. 747 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1915)