State v. Crowder
This text of 39 Tex. 47 (State v. Crowder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sufficiency of the indictment in this •case depends upon whether the word gambling may be [48]*48substituted for the word gaming, as adjectives qualifying-the noun “house.” We think the words are equivalent in this sense, under Article 2034, Paschal’s Digest, which declares that any thing or act that would be deemed a nuisance at common law shall be indictable as a misdemeanor under the statute. This indictment is good, and the court erred in quashing it.
The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 Tex. 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-crowder-tex-1873.