State v. Crossen

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

State v. Crossen

336 A.2d 239, 115 N.H. 137, 1975 N.H. LEXIS 243

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedMarch 31, 1975

DocketNo. 6984

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 336 A.2d 239 (State v. Crossen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Crossen, 336 A.2d 239, 115 N.H. 137, 1975 N.H. LEXIS 243 (N.H. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion

Defendant was convicted in a jury trial in which he was represented by counsel of two counts of selling a controlled drug. Defendant’s exceptions were reserved and transferred by Cann, J-

A review of the transcript does not support the claim of the defendant that he did not receive a fair trial. The claim that newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial should be addressed to the superior court. RSA 491:7 (Supp. 1973); State v. Long, 90 N.H. 103, 107, 4 A.2d 865, 868 (1939).

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum Opinion

Defendant was convicted in a jury trial in which he was represented by counsel of two counts of selling a controlled drug. Defendant’s exceptions were reserved and transferred by Cann, J-

A review of the transcript does not support the claim of the defendant that he did not receive a fair trial. The claim that newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial should be addressed to the superior court. RSA 491:7 (Supp. 1973); State v. Long, 90 N.H. 103, 107, 4 A.2d 865, 868 (1939).

Exceptions overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

336 A.2d 239, 115 N.H. 137, 1975 N.H. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-crossen-nh-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack