Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Crook

State v. Crook

527 So. 2d 938, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1529, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2884, 1988 WL 67277
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 30, 1988
DocketNo. 87-184
StatusPublished

This text of 527 So. 2d 938 (State v. Crook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Crook, 527 So. 2d 938, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1529, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2884, 1988 WL 67277 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

WENTWORTH, Judge.

The state seeks review of a suppression order entered in a prosecution for driving under the influence of alcoholic beverages. The case is before this court upon certification by the county court pursuant to Fla.R. App.P. 9.030(b)(4)(B). We conclude that the court below erred by suppressing evidence of appellee’s refusal to submit to a breath test after arrest. See State v. Castillo, 528 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Rice v. State, 525 So.2d 509 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). We therefore reverse the order appealed and remand the cause for further proceedings.

MILLS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rice v. State
525 So. 2d 509 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
State v. Castillo
528 So. 2d 1221 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
527 So. 2d 938, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1529, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2884, 1988 WL 67277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-crook-fladistctapp-1988.