State v. Crockrell

862 P.2d 115, 124 Or. App. 667, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1881
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 17, 1993·No. 10-91-08474; CA A73594·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

We allow the state’s motion for reconsideration of our opinion, 117 Or App 357, 844 P2d 239 (1992), withdraw our opinion and affirm.

Pursuant to plea negotiations, defendant agreed to plead guilty to rape in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree. ORS 163.375; ORS 163.427. In return, the state dismissed a third charge. After we issued our opinion, the Supreme Court held, in State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993), that ORS 138.222(2)(d) precludes any appellate review of a sentence that results from an agreement between the state and the defendant. The state is correct that we are precluded from reviewing defendant’s claim of error that the trial court erred in sentencing him. See also State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156, rev den 317 Or 272 (1993).

Reconsideration allowed; opinion withdrawn; affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Crockrell, 862 P.2d 115, 124 Or. App. 667, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1881 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

862 P.2d 115 (State v. Crockrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Crockrell
890 P.2d 1014 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)