State v. Criswell

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Criswell

DecidedDecember 2, 2011

Docket2011-UP-533

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Criswell (State v. Criswell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Criswell, (S.C. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Derrick Criswell, Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County
R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-533
Submitted November 1, 2011 Filed December 2, 2011

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Mark R. Farthing, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Derrick Criswell appeals his conviction for distribution of cocaine base, second offense. Criswell argues the trial court improperly enhanced his conviction to a second offense using a previous conviction for possession of crack cocaine from 1996. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Passaro, 350 S.C. 499, 505, 567 S.E.2d 862, 866 (2002) ("[A] guilty plea generally constitutes a waiver of non-jurisdictional defects and claims of violations of constitutional rights."); State v. Lopez, 352 S.C. 373, 378, 574 S.E.2d 210, 213 (Ct. App. 2002) (holding an issue must be raised to and ruled upon by the trial court in order to be considered on appeal).

AFFIRMED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Derrick Criswell, Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County
R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-533
Submitted November 1, 2011 Filed December 2, 2011

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Mark R. Farthing, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Derrick Criswell appeals his conviction for distribution of cocaine base, second offense. Criswell argues the trial court improperly enhanced his conviction to a second offense using a previous conviction for possession of crack cocaine from 1996. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Passaro, 350 S.C. 499, 505, 567 S.E.2d 862, 866 (2002) ("[A] guilty plea generally constitutes a waiver of non-jurisdictional defects and claims of violations of constitutional rights."); State v. Lopez, 352 S.C. 373, 378, 574 S.E.2d 210, 213 (Ct. App. 2002) (holding an issue must be raised to and ruled upon by the trial court in order to be considered on appeal).

AFFIRMED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Criswell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-criswell-scctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack