State v. Creech

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Creech

164 So. 162, 183 La. 433

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 4, 1935

DocketNos. 33566, 33567, 33568, 33569, 33579.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 164 So. 162 (State v. Creech) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Creech, 164 So. 162, 183 La. 433 (La. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

FOURNET, Justice.

Each defendant in the above-entitled and numbered cases was convicted in the parish of De Soto on a charge of operating a “blind tiger” and sentenced to pay fine of $301 and costs and serve thirty days in the parish jail. From their respective conviction and sentence, each has appealed.

The records contain neither a bill of exception nor a motion for a new trial, and, therefore, present nothing for this court to review..

The verdicts and sentences are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOURNET, Justice.

Each defendant in the above-entitled and numbered cases was convicted in the parish of De Soto on a charge of operating a “blind tiger” and sentenced to pay fine of $301 and costs and serve thirty days in the parish jail. From their respective conviction and sentence, each has appealed.

The records contain neither a bill of exception nor a motion for a new trial, and, therefore, present nothing for this court to review..

The verdicts and sentences are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 So. 162, 183 La. 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-creech-la-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack