State v. . Credle

63 N.C. 506
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1869·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Settle, J.

Nemo débet vis vexari, pro una et eadem causa,” is a principle of the common law, as well as of humanity.

The bill of indictment upon which the defendant was put to trial contained two counts, and there was a general verdict of not guilty.

Admitting that there was error in his Honor’s charge, as to the second count, it cannot be reviewed upon appeal by the *507 State; Siate v. Taylor, 1 Hawks 462 — for, while the humanity of our law gives the right of appeal to the accused in'rill cases, the class of cases in which the State has that right/- is-very small.- A legal acquittal in any Court of competent, jurisdiction, if the indictment bé good, as we'- think it was im this case, will preclude any subsequent proceedings before--evéry other Court.

Per Ctjriam. • Appeal dismissed!

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Credle, 63 N.C. 506 (N.C. 1869).

63 N.C. 506 (State v. . Credle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. . Nichols
200 S.E. 926 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
State v. . Savery
36 S.E. 22 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1900)
State v. . Ostwalt
24 S.E. 660 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1896)
State v. . Powell
86 N.C. 640 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1882)
State v. Council West
71 N.C. 263 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1874)