State v. . Credle
This text of 63 N.C. 506 (State v. . Credle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
“ Nemo débet vis vexari, pro una et eadem causa,” is a principle of the common law, as well as of humanity.
The bill of indictment upon which the defendant was put to trial contained two counts, and there was a general verdict of not guilty.
Admitting that there was error in his Honor’s charge, as to the second count, it cannot be reviewed upon appeal by the *507 State; Siate v. Taylor, 1 Hawks 462 — for, while the humanity of our law gives the right of appeal to the accused in'rill cases, the class of cases in which the State has that right/- is-very small.- A legal acquittal in any Court of competent, jurisdiction, if the indictment bé good, as we'- think it was im this case, will preclude any subsequent proceedings before--evéry other Court.
Per Ctjriam. • Appeal dismissed!
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 N.C. 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-credle-nc-1869.