State v. Creason
481 S.E.2d 87, 345 N.C. 181, 1996 N.C. LEXIS 744
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Creason. Read the opinion of the Court — 346 N.C. 165 →
Opinion
Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question is allowed 5 December 1996 except as to defendant’s Issue I, namely, whether defendant’s constitutional protection against double jeopardy was violated by his being punished both under the North Carolina Controlled Substance Tax Act and by a criminal prosecution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Creason, 481 S.E.2d 87, 345 N.C. 181, 1996 N.C. LEXIS 744 (N.C. 1996).
481 S.E.2d 87 (State v. Creason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.