State v. Crayton

344 S.W.3d 252, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 625, 2011 WL 1660641
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 3, 2011·No. ED 95049·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Crayton appeals from a sentence and judgment of murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2010).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Crayton, 344 S.W.3d 252, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 625, 2011 WL 1660641 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

344 S.W.3d 252 (State v. Crayton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Memhardt v. Missouri Department of Social Services, Children's Division
344 S.W.3d 252 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)