State v. Crayton

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Crayton

344 S.W.3d 252, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 625, 2011 WL 1660641

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 3, 2011

DocketED 95049

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 344 S.W.3d 252 (State v. Crayton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Crayton, 344 S.W.3d 252, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 625, 2011 WL 1660641 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Crayton appeals from a sentence and judgment of murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2010).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Crayton appeals from a sentence and judgment of murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2010).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

344 S.W.3d 252, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 625, 2011 WL 1660641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-crayton-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack