State v. Crawford Times

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Crawford Times

45 S.W.3d 485, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 554, 2001 WL 321908

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 3, 2001·No. No. ED 77141·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Crawford Times, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of robbery in the first degree, in violation of section 569.020 RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo 1994. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of thirty years for robbery and ten years for armed criminal action.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Crawford Times, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of robbery in the first degree, in violation of section 569.020 RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo 1994. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of thirty years for robbery and ten years for armed criminal action.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Crawford Times, 45 S.W.3d 485, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 554, 2001 WL 321908 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

45 S.W.3d 485 (State v. Crawford Times) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related