State v. Crawford

934 S.W.2d 637, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1922
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Crawford. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1151
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 26, 1996·No. Nos. 67434, 69326·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Zedric Crawford, appeals his judgments of conviction, after a jury trial, for second degree murder, first degree robbery, [638]*638two counts of armed criminal action and unlawful use of a weapon. Defendant was sentenced to three consecutive terms of twenty years for murder, robbery and the second armed criminal action count, and to concurrent terms of fifteen and five years, respectively, for the first armed criminal action count and unlawful use of a weapon. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion for defendant’s point regarding his direct appeal. The judgments of conviction are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

The judgment of the motion court denying defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Crawford, 934 S.W.2d 637, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1922 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

934 S.W.2d 637 (State v. Crawford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.