State v. Crawford

865 S.W.2d 794, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1583, 1993 WL 402932
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Crawford. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1151
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 12, 1993·No. Nos. 61068, 63360·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of two counts of unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030.1(1), RSMo 1986, and one count of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.-020, RSMo Supp.1992. He also appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Crawford, 865 S.W.2d 794, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1583, 1993 WL 402932 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

865 S.W.2d 794 (State v. Crawford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.