State v. Crawford

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Crawford

613 So. 2d 984, 1993 La. LEXIS 1082, 1993 WL 70927

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 12, 1993

DocketNo. 93-KK-0201

StatusPublished

This text of 613 So. 2d 984 (State v. Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Crawford, 613 So. 2d 984, 1993 La. LEXIS 1082, 1993 WL 70927 (La. 1993).

Pincite

Opinions

In re Crawford, Donald; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “C”, No. 358-059; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 92KA 2772.

Granted. Defendant’s motion for disclosure of the identity of the confidential informant is granted for the reasons expressed in Judge Plotkin’s dissent from the writ denial in the court of appeal. The district court should enter an appropriate order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Crawford, Donald; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “C”, No. 358-059; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 92KA 2772.

Granted. Defendant’s motion for disclosure of the identity of the confidential informant is granted for the reasons expressed in Judge Plotkin’s dissent from the writ denial in the court of appeal. The district court should enter an appropriate order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

613 So. 2d 984, 1993 La. LEXIS 1082, 1993 WL 70927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-crawford-la-1993.