State v. Crane

744 P.2d 1334, 88 Or. App. 364, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 5174
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedNovember 18, 1987
DocketCF 86-260; CA A43985
StatusPublished

This text of 744 P.2d 1334 (State v. Crane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Crane, 744 P.2d 1334, 88 Or. App. 364, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 5174 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals her conviction for driving while suspended. She contends that the court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence obtained after a stop of the vehicle that she was driving. The state concedes that the stop was unlawful and that the motion should have been granted. We agree. State v. Black, 80 Or App 12, 721 P2d 842 (1986).

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Black
721 P.2d 842 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
744 P.2d 1334, 88 Or. App. 364, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 5174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-crane-orctapp-1987.