State v. Cramer
This text of 483 A.2d 205 (State v. Cramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Leave to appeal is granted, limited to the issue of whether defendant’s statement at the November 3, 1982 arraignment is admissible, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division for its determination of whether defendant’s statement is admissible in light of United States v. Ceccolini, 435 U.S. 268, 98 S.Ct. 1054, 55 L.Ed.2d 268 (1978), and whether defendant’s statement at the arraignment is admissible in light of State v. Wright, 97 N.J. 113 (1984), and Oregon v. Bradshaw, 462 U.S. 1039, 103 S.Ct. 2830, 77 L.Ed.2d 405 (1983).
Jurisdiction is not retained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
483 A.2d 205, 97 N.J. 694, 1984 N.J. LEXIS 3206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cramer-nj-1984.