State v. Cramer

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Cramer

194 S.W.3d 923, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1039, 2006 WL 1827168

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 5, 2006·No. No. ED 86623·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Anthony L. Cramer, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of assault in the first degree. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court plainly erred when it failed to declare a mistrial sua sponte during the testimony of a witness.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Anthony L. Cramer, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of assault in the first degree. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court plainly erred when it failed to declare a mistrial sua sponte during the testimony of a witness.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Cramer, 194 S.W.3d 923, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1039, 2006 WL 1827168 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

194 S.W.3d 923 (State v. Cramer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.