State v. . Craft

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Craft

146 S.E. 926, 196 N.C. 826, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 124

DecidedMarch 6, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 146 S.E. 926 (State v. . Craft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Craft, 146 S.E. 926, 196 N.C. 826, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 124 (N.C. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

At the' close of the State’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, both the defendants made motions for judgment of *827 nonsuit. C. S., 4643. The defendant, J. E. Craft, did not offer any evidence. The defendants’ exceptions and assignments of error present the sole question as to whether or not on all the evidence it was sufficient to be submitted to a jury. We think so.

The evidence was circumstantial, but sufficient to have been submitted to the jury; the probative force was for them to determine. S. v. Lawrence, ante, 562. We find in law

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

At the' close of the State’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, both the defendants made motions for judgment of *827 nonsuit. C. S., 4643. The defendant, J. E. Craft, did not offer any evidence. The defendants’ exceptions and assignments of error present the sole question as to whether or not on all the evidence it was sufficient to be submitted to a jury. We think so.

The evidence was circumstantial, but sufficient to have been submitted to the jury; the probative force was for them to determine. S. v. Lawrence, ante, 562. We find in law

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 S.E. 926, 196 N.C. 826, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-craft-nc-1929.