State v. CPS Chemical Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. CPS Chemical Co.

523 A.2d 151, 105 N.J. 502, 1985 N.J. LEXIS 3337

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedMarch 29, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 523 A.2d 151 (State v. CPS Chemical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. CPS Chemical Co., 523 A.2d 151, 105 N.J. 502, 1985 N.J. LEXIS 3337 (N.J. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal is denied without prejudice to the State’s right to apply within 14 days from the filing date of this Order to Assignment Judge Samuel D. Lenox, who presided over the Madison grand jury pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:73A-6, for further relief including reference of the matter back to the trial judge who originally heard the underlying application herein, and provided further that within seven days of the disposition of such an application or within 21 days of the filing of this Order if no such application is made, the appropriate trial judge shall review in camera each item that defendants seek to have released for discovery purposes to make certain that defendants’ needs outweigh the public interest in grand jury secrecy. (See 198 N.J.Super. 236)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to appeal is denied without prejudice to the State’s right to apply within 14 days from the filing date of this Order to Assignment Judge Samuel D. Lenox, who presided over the Madison grand jury pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:73A-6, for further relief including reference of the matter back to the trial judge who originally heard the underlying application herein, and provided further that within seven days of the disposition of such an application or within 21 days of the filing of this Order if no such application is made, the appropriate trial judge shall review in camera each item that defendants seek to have released for discovery purposes to make certain that defendants’ needs outweigh the public interest in grand jury secrecy. (See 198 N.J.Super. 236)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

523 A.2d 151, 105 N.J. 502, 1985 N.J. LEXIS 3337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cps-chemical-co-nj-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack