State v. Cozad

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Cozad

150 P.3d 1113, 210 Or. App. 465, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 116

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJanuary 4, 2007

Docket02CR0825; A119560

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 150 P.3d 1113 (State v. Cozad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cozad, 150 P.3d 1113, 210 Or. App. 465, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 116 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER VACATING COURT’S DECISION

On October 29, 2003, the court issued its decision affirming without opinion (190 Or App 397, 79 P3d 916). By order dated February 5, 2004, the court gave appellant’s counsel leave to file a motion to vacate the court’s decision. It does not appear that counsel filed a motion to vacate; however, in due course, this case was rebriefed and is now at issue.

The court on its own motion vacated its October 20, 2003, decision.

David V. Brewer, Chief Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER VACATING COURT’S DECISION

On October 29, 2003, the court issued its decision affirming without opinion (190 Or App 397, 79 P3d 916). By order dated February 5, 2004, the court gave appellant’s counsel leave to file a motion to vacate the court’s decision. It does not appear that counsel filed a motion to vacate; however, in due course, this case was rebriefed and is now at issue.

The court on its own motion vacated its October 20, 2003, decision.

David V. Brewer, Chief Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 P.3d 1113, 210 Or. App. 465, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cozad-orctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack