State v. Cozad

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Cozad

150 P.3d 1113, 210 Or. App. 465, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 116

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided January 4, 2007·No. 02CR0825; A119560·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER VACATING COURT’S DECISION

On October 29, 2003, the court issued its decision affirming without opinion (190 Or App 397, 79 P3d 916). By order dated February 5, 2004, the court gave appellant’s counsel leave to file a motion to vacate the court’s decision. It does not appear that counsel filed a motion to vacate; however, in due course, this case was rebriefed and is now at issue.

The court on its own motion vacated its October 20, 2003, decision.

David V. Brewer, Chief Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER VACATING COURT’S DECISION

On October 29, 2003, the court issued its decision affirming without opinion (190 Or App 397, 79 P3d 916). By order dated February 5, 2004, the court gave appellant’s counsel leave to file a motion to vacate the court’s decision. It does not appear that counsel filed a motion to vacate; however, in due course, this case was rebriefed and is now at issue.

The court on its own motion vacated its October 20, 2003, decision.

David V. Brewer, Chief Judge

State v. Cozad, 150 P.3d 1113, 210 Or. App. 465, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 116 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

150 P.3d 1113 (State v. Cozad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related