State v. Coyne

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Coyne

310 S.W.3d 776, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 678, 2010 WL 1978032

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 18, 2010·No. ED 93596·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Patrick Coyne (Defendant) appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of stealing and third-degree assault.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.26(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Patrick Coyne (Defendant) appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of stealing and third-degree assault.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.26(b).

State v. Coyne, 310 S.W.3d 776, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 678, 2010 WL 1978032 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

310 S.W.3d 776 (State v. Coyne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.