State v. . Cox

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Cox

36 S.E.2d 260, 225 N.C. 773, 1945 N.C. LEXIS 407

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 12, 1945·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only exceptive assignment of error is directed to alleged error in the charge. The defendant insists the court, in reviewing the contentions of the State, used language which tended to discredit witnesses for the defendant and, in effect, constituted an expression of opinion.

We are not persuaded the contention as stated by the court is not reasonably supported by the facts and circumstances appearing on this record. In any event it did not constitute an intimation of the opinion of the court or otherwise impinge upon the provisions of Gf. S., 1-180. Hence the assignment of error is without substantial merit.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The only exceptive assignment of error is directed to alleged error in the charge. The defendant insists the court, in reviewing the contentions of the State, used language which tended to discredit witnesses for the defendant and, in effect, constituted an expression of opinion.

We are not persuaded the contention as stated by the court is not reasonably supported by the facts and circumstances appearing on this record. In any event it did not constitute an intimation of the opinion of the court or otherwise impinge upon the provisions of Gf. S., 1-180. Hence the assignment of error is without substantial merit.

No error.

State v. . Cox, 36 S.E.2d 260, 225 N.C. 773, 1945 N.C. LEXIS 407 (N.C. 1945).

Pincite

36 S.E.2d 260 (State v. . Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.