State v. . Cox
This text of 36 S.E.2d 260 (State v. . Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only exceptive assignment of error is directed to alleged error in the charge. The defendant insists the court, in reviewing the contentions of the State, used language which tended to discredit witnesses for the defendant and, in effect, constituted an expression of opinion.
We are not persuaded the contention as stated by the court is not reasonably supported by the facts and circumstances appearing on this record. In any event it did not constitute an intimation of the opinion of the court or otherwise impinge upon the provisions of Gf. S., 1-180. Hence the assignment of error is without substantial merit.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 S.E.2d 260, 225 N.C. 773, 1945 N.C. LEXIS 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cox-nc-1945.