State v. Cox
188 S.W.3d 126, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 408, 2006 WL 850694
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Timothy W. Cox appeals his convictions for second-degree assault, § 565.060, 1 and armed criminal action, § 571.015. On appeal, Mr. Cox claims that the circuit court erred in refusing self-defense instruction B, because it violated the right to due process, Rule 28.02, 2 and the Notes on Use to MAI-CR3d 306.06 3 since there was no substantial evidence that he was the initial aggressor.
For the reasons set forth in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Cox, 188 S.W.3d 126, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 408, 2006 WL 850694 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).
188 S.W.3d 126 (State v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Esters v. State
188 S.W.3d 126 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)