State v. Cox

188 S.W.3d 126, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 408, 2006 WL 850694
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 4, 2006
DocketWD 64942
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 188 S.W.3d 126 (State v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Cox, 188 S.W.3d 126, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 408, 2006 WL 850694 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Timothy W. Cox appeals his convictions for second-degree assault, § 565.060, 1 and armed criminal action, § 571.015. On appeal, Mr. Cox claims that the circuit court erred in refusing self-defense instruction B, because it violated the right to due process, Rule 28.02, 2 and the Notes on Use to MAI-CR3d 306.06 3 since there was no substantial evidence that he was the initial aggressor.

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo. (2000), unless otherwise indicated.

2

. Rule references are to the Missouri Rules of Criminal Procedure.

3

.MAI-CR3d references are to the Missouri Approved Instructions and Charges, Criminal (3d ed. 2001 Supp.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Esters v. State
188 S.W.3d 126 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 S.W.3d 126, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 408, 2006 WL 850694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cox-moctapp-2006.