State v. Coward

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Coward

340 S.W.3d 344, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 546, 2011 WL 1542726

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 26, 2011

DocketWD 70867

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 340 S.W.3d 344 (State v. Coward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Coward, 340 S.W.3d 344, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 546, 2011 WL 1542726 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Craig D. Coward appeals his conviction, after a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Cass County, for the Class A felony of domestic assault in the first degree, pursuant to section 565.072, RSMo Cum.Supp. 2008. On appeal, Coward argues that the trial court erred in excluding certain evidence. We affirm in this per curiam order and have provided the parties a legal memorandum explaining our ruling. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Craig D. Coward appeals his conviction, after a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Cass County, for the Class A felony of domestic assault in the first degree, pursuant to section 565.072, RSMo Cum.Supp. 2008. On appeal, Coward argues that the trial court erred in excluding certain evidence. We affirm in this per curiam order and have provided the parties a legal memorandum explaining our ruling. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

340 S.W.3d 344, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 546, 2011 WL 1542726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-coward-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack