State v. Court of Appeal, Third Circuit

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Court of Appeal, Third Circuit

234 So. 2d 191, 255 La. 1089, 1970 La. LEXIS 3792

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 24, 1970

DocketNo. 50182

StatusPublished

This text of 234 So. 2d 191 (State v. Court of Appeal, Third Circuit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, 234 So. 2d 191, 255 La. 1089, 1970 La. LEXIS 3792 (La. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Considering the foregoing motion alleging that the plaintiff-relator and the defendants have agreed to a compromise settlement of all claims asserted in this suit, and that relator has abandoned his application for writs pending in this Court and the parties wish that the Court remand it to the Sixteenth Judicial District Court for Iberia Parish, Louisiana so that it will be vested with jurisdiction to make findings of fact and render Reasons for Judgment and Judgment and thereby permitting relator to consummate the settlement of his claims and grant a valid release, this Court finding the parties are entitled'to an order as prayed for;

It is ordered that the application for writ of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition filed by John Istre herein is abandoned and is hereby recalled and dismissed;

It is further ordered that this case be and it is hereby remanded to the Sixteenth Judicial District Court for Iberia Parish, Louisiana for the purpose of making findings of fact and rendering Reasons For Judgment and Judgment in favor of plaintiff in accordance therewith, in order that plaintiff-relator may compromise and settle all of his claims against the defendants herein and execute valid release of said defendants from liability.

Former decision, 228 So.2d 485.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Considering the foregoing motion alleging that the plaintiff-relator and the defendants have agreed to a compromise settlement of all claims asserted in this suit, and that relator has abandoned his application for writs pending in this Court and the parties wish that the Court remand it to the Sixteenth Judicial District Court for Iberia Parish, Louisiana so that it will be vested with jurisdiction to make findings of fact and render Reasons for Judgment and Judgment and thereby permitting relator to consummate the settlement of his claims and grant a valid release, this Court finding the parties are entitled'to an order as prayed for;

It is ordered that the application for writ of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition filed by John Istre herein is abandoned and is hereby recalled and dismissed;

It is further ordered that this case be and it is hereby remanded to the Sixteenth Judicial District Court for Iberia Parish, Louisiana for the purpose of making findings of fact and rendering Reasons For Judgment and Judgment in favor of plaintiff in accordance therewith, in order that plaintiff-relator may compromise and settle all of his claims against the defendants herein and execute valid release of said defendants from liability.

Former decision, 228 So.2d 485.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 So. 2d 191, 255 La. 1089, 1970 La. LEXIS 3792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-court-of-appeal-third-circuit-la-1970.