State v. Cotton

787 So. 2d 278, 2001 La. LEXIS 1125, 2001 WL 419173
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 20, 2001·No. No. 2000-KK-0850·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Application for rehearing granted in part to clarify that the State is not required, in a Prieur hearing, to introduce evidence detailing the present charges against defendant. As always, however, the State must show that the other crimes evidence sought to be introduced tends to prove any of the La. C.E. art. 404(B) factors for which the evidence is offered, ie., whether the evidence has any probative value. In the instant case, despite the fact that the State has had two opportunities to make the required showing, the evidence of the other crimes in this record does not establish that the probative value of that evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect. The application for rehearing is otherwise denied.

TRAYLOR, KNOLL, VICTORY, JJ., would grant the rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Cotton, 787 So. 2d 278, 2001 La. LEXIS 1125, 2001 WL 419173 (La. 2001).

787 So. 2d 278 (State v. Cotton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cotton
818 So. 2d 968 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2002)