State v. Costanzo
802 So. 2d 515, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18553, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 148
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 26, 2001·No. No. 3D00-2923·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. See Roberts v. Lando, 652 So.2d 1226 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (holding that where counsel did not receive notice of trial date, defendant and his counsel were continually available for trial and [516]*516continuance should not have been charged to defendant for purposes of speedy trial).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Costanzo, 802 So. 2d 515, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18553, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 148 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
802 So. 2d 515 (State v. Costanzo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dixon v. State
901 So. 2d 384 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)