State v. Costanzo
802 So. 2d 515, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18553, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 148
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 26, 2001
DocketNo. 3D00-2923
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 802 So. 2d 515 (State v. Costanzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Costanzo, 802 So. 2d 515, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18553, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 148 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Roberts v. Lando, 652 So.2d 1226 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (holding that where counsel did not receive notice of trial date, defendant and his counsel were continually available for trial and [516]*516continuance should not have been charged to defendant for purposes of speedy trial).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dixon v. State
901 So. 2d 384 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
802 So. 2d 515, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18553, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-costanzo-fladistctapp-2001.