State v. Costa
226 A.2d 664, 154 Conn. 746
This text of 226 A.2d 664 (State v. Costa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Costa, 226 A.2d 664, 154 Conn. 746 (Colo. 1967).
Opinion
The motion by Richard R. Stewart to have F. Lee Bailey, Esq., admitted to practice before the Supreme Court as additional counsel in the appeal from the Superior Court in Litchfield County is denied, but permission is granted to F. Lee Bailey, Esq., of the Massachusetts bar to participate with Connecticut counsel in the argument and brief in this court in the above-entitled case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
226 A.2d 664, 154 Conn. 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-costa-conn-1967.