State v. Cortese
139 A. 923, 104 N.J.L. 447, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 336
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance, — Trencitabd, Mintuen, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Cortese, 139 A. 923, 104 N.J.L. 447, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 336 (N.J. 1927).
139 A. 923 (State v. Cortese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Engel
592 A.2d 572 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1991)
State v. Novembrino
519 A.2d 820 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1987)
Eleuteri v. Richman
135 A.2d 191 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)