State v. Cortese
139 A. 923, 104 N.J.L. 447, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 336
This text of 139 A. 923 (State v. Cortese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Cortese, 139 A. 923, 104 N.J.L. 447, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 336 (N.J. 1927).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance, — Trencitabd, Mintuen, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Engel
592 A.2d 572 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1991)
State v. Novembrino
519 A.2d 820 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1987)
Eleuteri v. Richman
135 A.2d 191 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
139 A. 923, 104 N.J.L. 447, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cortese-nj-1927.