State v. Corriveau

547 A.2d 1040, 1988 Me. LEXIS 238
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedSeptember 30, 1988
StatusPublished

This text of 547 A.2d 1040 (State v. Corriveau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Corriveau, 547 A.2d 1040, 1988 Me. LEXIS 238 (Me. 1988).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Raymond P. Corriveau appeals his conviction after a jury trial in Superior Court (Kennebec County; Alexander, J.) on two counts of Class C unlawful sexual contact with a minor. 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(C) (Supp.1987). Viewing the charge to the jury as a whole, we find no error, let alone “obvious” prejudicial error, in two instructions to which Corriveau objects for the first time on appeal. Contrary to Corri-veau’s contention, the record reveals no abuse of discretion in the presiding justice’s overruling of his general objection to one of the State’s cross-examination questions. M.R.Evid. 403, 611. See State v. Doughty, 399 A.2d 1319, 1323 (Me.1979).

The entry is: Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Doughty
399 A.2d 1319 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
547 A.2d 1040, 1988 Me. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-corriveau-me-1988.