State v. Corrick
This text of 359 Mont. 75 (State v. Corrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On March 9, 2010, the defendant was sentenced to ten (10) years in the Montana State Prison, with three (3) years suspended for the offense of Count I: Theft of Property by Embezzlement, Common Scheme, a felony.
On October 8,2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Richard Phillips. The state was represented by Martin Lambert.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rides of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 8th day of October, 2010.
DATED this 21st day of October, 2010.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
359 Mont. 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-corrick-mont-2010.