State v. Correa

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Correa

199 A.3d 19, 330 Conn. 959

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 10, 2019·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 185 Conn.App. 308, 197 A.3d 393 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that a police canine sniff that took place outside of the defendant's motel room was not a search that violated the defendant's rights under article first, § 7, of the Connecticut constitution?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the visual sweep of the defendant's motel room was justified by exigent circumstances?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 185 Conn.App. 308, 197 A.3d 393 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that a police canine sniff that took place outside of the defendant's motel room was not a search that violated the defendant's rights under article first, § 7, of the Connecticut constitution?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the visual sweep of the defendant's motel room was justified by exigent circumstances?"

State v. Correa, 199 A.3d 19, 330 Conn. 959 (Colo. 2019).

Pincite

199 A.3d 19 (State v. Correa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related