State v. Corpus

Hawaii Supreme Court

State v. Corpus

613 P.2d 362, 62 Haw. 297

CourtHawaii Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 11, 1980

DocketNO. 7453

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 613 P.2d 362 (State v. Corpus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Corpus, 613 P.2d 362, 62 Haw. 297 (haw 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In these cases, defendants were charged in the district court for violating HRS § 712-1231, relating to social gambling, and moved to dismiss the charges against them. The district court denied their motions to dismiss. Those denials were interlocutory orders of a district court in criminal cases. Upon entry of orders denying the motions, defendants moved in the district court for leave to take interlocutory appeals to this court, which motions were granted.

In State v. Valiani, 57 Haw. 133, 552 P.2d 75 (1976), this court held that there is no grant of any statutory authority to appeal to this court from interlocutory orders of district courts in criminal cases.

Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed and remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

Herbert R. Takahashi (King, Nakamura & Takahashi of counsel) for defendants-appellants. Glenn M. Miyajima (Michael P. Akana on the brief) Deputy Prosecuting Attorneys, for plaintiff-appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In these cases, defendants were charged in the district court for violating HRS § 712-1231, relating to social gambling, and moved to dismiss the charges against them. The district court denied their motions to dismiss. Those denials were interlocutory orders of a district court in criminal cases. Upon entry of orders denying the motions, defendants moved in the district court for leave to take interlocutory appeals to this court, which motions were granted.

In State v. Valiani, 57 Haw. 133, 552 P.2d 75 (1976), this court held that there is no grant of any statutory authority to appeal to this court from interlocutory orders of district courts in criminal cases.

Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed and remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

Herbert R. Takahashi (King, Nakamura & Takahashi of counsel) for defendants-appellants. Glenn M. Miyajima (Michael P. Akana on the brief) Deputy Prosecuting Attorneys, for plaintiff-appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

613 P.2d 362, 62 Haw. 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-corpus-haw-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack