State v. Corporation of New Brunswick
This text of 1 N.J.L. 450 (State v. Corporation of New Brunswick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is no necessity for a previous notice to be given of such a motion. If the writ issues improvidently, it is a ground of defence, and may be taken advantage of on the return. We think there is sufficient information before the court to induce us to allow the writ. Let a certiorari issue.
Cited in State v. Hanford, 6 Hal. 71; State v. Mor. Can. & Bkg. Co., 2 Gr. 427; Camden v. Mulford, 2 Dutch. 55; State v. Jersey City, 5 Vr. 400.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 N.J.L. 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-corporation-of-new-brunswick-nj-1795.