State v. Coronel-Rodriguez
This text of State v. Coronel-Rodriguez (State v. Coronel-Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE
STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,
v.
JOSE ANTONIO CORONEL-RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner.
No. 1 CA-CR 24-0510 PRPC
FILED 07-29-2025
Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CR2007-007126-001 The Honorable Kerstin G. LeMaire, Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED
COUNSEL
Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix By Phillip D. Garrow Counsel for Respondent
Jose Antonio Coronel-Rodriguez, Buckeye Petitioner Pro Se STATE v. CORONEL-RODRIGUEZ Decision of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Presiding Judge Brian Y. Furuya, Chief Judge Randall M. Howe, and Judge David B. Gass delivered the decision of the Court.
PER CURIAM:
¶1 Jose Antonio Coronel-Rodriguez petitions this Court for review from the dismissal of his third petition for post-conviction relief. We have considered his petition and grant review but deny relief.
¶2 We review the superior court’s ruling on a petition for post- conviction relief for an abuse of discretion, “which occurs if the court makes an error of law or fails to adequately investigate the facts necessary to support its decision.” State v. Bigger, 251 Ariz. 402, 407 ¶ 6 (2021). It is the petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538 ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). We will affirm the trial court’s ruling if legally correct for any reason. See State v. Perez, 141 Ariz. 459, 464 (1984).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order dismissing the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.
¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
MATTHEW J. MARTIN • Clerk of the Court FILED: JR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Coronel-Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-coronel-rodriguez-arizctapp-2025.