State v. Cornwell, Unpublished Decision (2-27-1998)

Ohio Court of Appeals

State v. Cornwell, Unpublished Decision (2-27-1998)

DecidedFebruary 27, 1998

DocketNo. 95-T-5379.

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Cornwell, Unpublished Decision (2-27-1998) (State v. Cornwell, Unpublished Decision (2-27-1998)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cornwell, Unpublished Decision (2-27-1998), (Ohio Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part. See Opinion and Judgment Entry. [CHRISTLEY] (FORD) (O'NEILL)

CRIMINAL LAW/CONSTITUTIONAL:

In cases involving allegations of child abuse, a defendant is not necessarily prejudiced by the failure of the indictment to specify the exact dates and times upon which the charged offenses allegedly occurred if such failure does not impose a material detriment to the preparation of his or her defense.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part. See Opinion and Judgment Entry. [CHRISTLEY] (FORD) (O'NEILL)

CRIMINAL LAW/CONSTITUTIONAL:

In cases involving allegations of child abuse, a defendant is not necessarily prejudiced by the failure of the indictment to specify the exact dates and times upon which the charged offenses allegedly occurred if such failure does not impose a material detriment to the preparation of his or her defense.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Cornwell, Unpublished Decision (2-27-1998), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cornwell-unpublished-decision-2-27-1998-ohioctapp-1998.