State v. Cornwell

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Cornwell

784 N.E.2d 709, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1475

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 6, 2003

Docket1997-1390

StatusPublished

This text of 784 N.E.2d 709 (State v. Cornwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cornwell, 784 N.E.2d 709, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1475 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Mahoning C.P. No. 96CR525. On October 14, 1999, and February 17, 2000, respectively, this court [1476]*1476stayed the execution of sentence in this cause pending the timely filing and disposition of appellant’s appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States and the exhaustion of available state remedies. It appearing to the court that all matters have since been disposed of in case No. 1997-1390, appellant’s direct appeal of his conviction, and in case No. 2002-1865, appellant’s post-conviction appeal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the stays of execution entered in this cause on October 14,1999, and February 17, 2000, be and hereby are, revoked.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by this court that said sentence be carried into execution by the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility or, in his absence, by the Deputy Warden on Tuesday, the 3rd day of June, 2003, in accordance with the statutes so provided.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certified copy of this entry and a warrant under the seal of this court be duly certified to the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and that said Warden shall make due return thereof to the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas of Mahoning County.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahoning C.P. No. 96CR525. On October 14, 1999, and February 17, 2000, respectively, this court [1476]*1476stayed the execution of sentence in this cause pending the timely filing and disposition of appellant’s appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States and the exhaustion of available state remedies. It appearing to the court that all matters have since been disposed of in case No. 1997-1390, appellant’s direct appeal of his conviction, and in case No. 2002-1865, appellant’s post-conviction appeal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the stays of execution entered in this cause on October 14,1999, and February 17, 2000, be and hereby are, revoked.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by this court that said sentence be carried into execution by the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility or, in his absence, by the Deputy Warden on Tuesday, the 3rd day of June, 2003, in accordance with the statutes so provided.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certified copy of this entry and a warrant under the seal of this court be duly certified to the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and that said Warden shall make due return thereof to the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas of Mahoning County.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

784 N.E.2d 709, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cornwell-ohio-2003.