State v. Corkrey

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Corkrey

64 Me. 521

DecidedJuly 1, 1874

StatusPublished

This text of 64 Me. 521 (State v. Corkrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Corkrey, 64 Me. 521 (Me. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

Dickerson, J.

The record of the municipal court in this case shows that the respondent filed a plea of misnomer, and that the decision was against her upon that plea; and that, thereupon, judgment was rendered against her. By thus electing to go to trial solely upon the plea of misnomer in the municipal court, the respondent waived her right to plead anew in the appellate court and go to trial on the merits. Exceptions overruled.

Appleton, C. J., Walton, Barrows, Yirgin and Peters, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dickerson, J.

The record of the municipal court in this case shows that the respondent filed a plea of misnomer, and that the decision was against her upon that plea; and that, thereupon, judgment was rendered against her. By thus electing to go to trial solely upon the plea of misnomer in the municipal court, the respondent waived her right to plead anew in the appellate court and go to trial on the merits. Exceptions overruled.

Appleton, C. J., Walton, Barrows, Yirgin and Peters, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 Me. 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-corkrey-me-1874.