State v. Cordosi
678 N.E.2d 1230, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1494, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1497
This text of 678 N.E.2d 1230 (State v. Cordosi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Cordosi, 678 N.E.2d 1230, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1494, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1497 (Ohio 1997).
Opinion
Clark App. No. 95CA0126. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the question certified by the court of appeals at page 3 of its Decision and Entry filed March 5,1997:
“The question certified to the Ohio Supreme Court is as follows:
“Whether a finding pursuant to Evid.R. 601(A) that a child under ten years of age is incompetent to testify at trial makes that child’s testimony ‘not reasonably obtainable’ for purposes of Evid.R. 802(A)(2) under the standards set out in Evid.R. 807(B)(2), rendering admissible an out-of-court statement that the child allegedly made describing a sexual act or act of violence performed with or on, or directed against, the child.” [The conflict case is State v. Black (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 724, 622 N.E.2d 1166.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Cardosi
698 N.E.2d 1003 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
678 N.E.2d 1230, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1494, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cordosi-ohio-1997.