State v. Cordia

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Cordia

151 S.W. 1183, 168 Mo. App. 132, 1912 Mo. App. LEXIS 412

DecidedNovember 12, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 151 S.W. 1183 (State v. Cordia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cordia, 151 S.W. 1183, 168 Mo. App. 132, 1912 Mo. App. LEXIS 412 (Mo. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

CAULFIELD, J.

Defendant was indicted, tried ■and, on September 7, 1910, convicted, under section 11640 of the Revised -'Statutes of Missouri 1909, for selling intoxicating liquor in less quantity than five gallons, he being a merchant, having a merchant’s li- cense authorizing him to deal in goods, ware and mer"chandise, but no dramshop license. He appeals to this ■ court but has assigned no error and filed- no brief here. Having examined the record we find no error, "insufficiency, or irregularity in the indictment, trial or other proceedings, justifying a reversal- of the judgment, and find that the evidence warrants the conviction and the instructions fairly present the case to the jury.

.The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Reynolds, P. J., and Nortoni, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CAULFIELD, J.

Defendant was indicted, tried ■and, on September 7, 1910, convicted, under section 11640 of the Revised -'Statutes of Missouri 1909, for selling intoxicating liquor in less quantity than five gallons, he being a merchant, having a merchant’s li- cense authorizing him to deal in goods, ware and mer"chandise, but no dramshop license. He appeals to this ■ court but has assigned no error and filed- no brief here. Having examined the record we find no error, "insufficiency, or irregularity in the indictment, trial or other proceedings, justifying a reversal- of the judgment, and find that the evidence warrants the conviction and the instructions fairly present the case to the jury.

.The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Reynolds, P. J., and Nortoni, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 S.W. 1183, 168 Mo. App. 132, 1912 Mo. App. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cordia-moctapp-1912.