State v. Corcoran

168 P.3d 335, 215 Or. App. 107, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1306
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedSeptember 19, 2007
Docket030067CR; A127120
StatusPublished

This text of 168 P.3d 335 (State v. Corcoran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Corcoran, 168 P.3d 335, 215 Or. App. 107, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1306 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from his conviction for sex abuse in the third degree, ORS 163.415. He assigns error to (1) the denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal, (2) the denial of his motion for a new trial, (3) the imposition of a compensatory fine, and (4) the imposition of a probation condition that defendant undergo sexual offender treatment. We reject, without discussion, defendant’s first, second, and fourth assignments of error. With respect to the third assignment of error, the state concedes that the record is devoid of any evidence supporting the imposition of a compensatory fine. That concession is well-founded, see State v. Donahue, 165 Or App 143, 995 P2d 1202 (2000); accordingly, we vacate the imposition of the compensatory fine.

Compensatory fine vacated; case remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Donahue
995 P.2d 1202 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 P.3d 335, 215 Or. App. 107, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-corcoran-orctapp-2007.