Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Corbeil

State v. Corbeil

676 A.2d 1374, 237 Conn. 919, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 225
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMay 28, 1996
DocketSC 15427
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 676 A.2d 1374 (State v. Corbeil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Corbeil, 676 A.2d 1374, 237 Conn. 919, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 225 (Colo. 1996).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 41 Conn. App. 7 (AC 13990), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[920]*920The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15427. Todd Edgington, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Ronald G. Weller, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided May 28, 1996*
“Under the state constitution, if initial statements made by a defendant are excluded only because of a Miranda violation, and not because they were coerced, must the subsequent post-Miranda statements be excluded in the absence of a showing of a break in the stream of events?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Nalewajk
211 A.3d 122 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
676 A.2d 1374, 237 Conn. 919, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-corbeil-conn-1996.