State v. Corbeil
676 A.2d 1374, 237 Conn. 919, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 225
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 41 Conn. App. 7 (AC 13990), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Under the state constitution, if initial statements made by a defendant are excluded only because of a Miranda violation, and not because they were coerced, must the subsequent post-Miranda statements be excluded in the absence of a showing of a break in the stream of events?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Corbeil, 676 A.2d 1374, 237 Conn. 919, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 225 (Colo. 1996).
676 A.2d 1374 (State v. Corbeil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Nalewajk
211 A.3d 122 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2019)