State v. Corbeil

676 A.2d 1374, 237 Conn. 919, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 225
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 28, 1996·No. SC 15427·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 41 Conn. App. 7 (AC 13990), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[920]*920The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15427. Todd Edgington, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Ronald G. Weller, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided May 28, 1996*
“Under the state constitution, if initial statements made by a defendant are excluded only because of a Miranda violation, and not because they were coerced, must the subsequent post-Miranda statements be excluded in the absence of a showing of a break in the stream of events?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Corbeil, 676 A.2d 1374, 237 Conn. 919, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 225 (Colo. 1996).

676 A.2d 1374 (State v. Corbeil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Nalewajk
211 A.3d 122 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2019)