State v. Copher

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Copher

861 S.W.2d 202, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1456, 1993 WL 360865

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 21, 1993·No. Nos. 61015, 63034·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Willie G. Copher, appeals from the denial of his jury conviction in the County of St. Louis of first degree assault, RSMo. § 565.050 (1986), and armed criminal action, RSMo § 571.015 (1986). Additionally, appellant appeals from a denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the motion court’s order pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Willie G. Copher, appeals from the denial of his jury conviction in the County of St. Louis of first degree assault, RSMo. § 565.050 (1986), and armed criminal action, RSMo § 571.015 (1986). Additionally, appellant appeals from a denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the motion court’s order pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

State v. Copher, 861 S.W.2d 202, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1456, 1993 WL 360865 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

861 S.W.2d 202 (State v. Copher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related